To succeed in systems thinking, you need both linear and nonlinear thinking. Linear thinking helps break down complicated issues into manageable pieces and identify cause-and-effect connections. Nonlinear thinking helps understand the bigger picture and interdependence between parts of a system. Use both approaches together for a comprehensive understanding and practical solutions.
When constructing a design system, employing systems thinking and embracing the Icebergs Model can significantly impact developing design elements. By delving beyond surface-level events and behaviour patterns, designers can uncover the root causes that shape user experiences. This holistic understanding enables the creation of more effective design elements and a cohesive user experience.
Let's explore a different UI example that incorporates the concept of stocks and flows: a collaborative checklist application.
In this scenario, the stocks represent the items within the checklist. These stocks include individual tasks or items that users can add, remove, or modify. Each item in the checklist represents a stock, contributing to the overall content available for users to manage.
Now, let's examine the flows within this UI example. The flows represent the movement and interaction of users with the checklist items. Users can add new items to the checklist, remove existing items, and check them off as completed. These actions generate flows within the system, reflecting the changes made to the checklist.
In addition to individual user interactions, this checklist is designed for collaboration, allowing multiple users to update and modify the checklist items. When one user updates an item, such as changing its text or marking it as completed, that action generates a flow of data within the system, indicating the modification made by the specific user.
The collaborative nature of the checklist introduces a new dimension to the flows. When other users access the shared checklist, they can see the updates made by other users in real-time. The system facilitates the synchronization of data, enabling users to view the modified text, completion status, and the user who made the update. This flow of updates and user information fosters transparency and collaboration among the checklist participants.
As users interact with the checklist, adding, removing, updating, and checking off items, the system dynamically updates the content to reflect the current state of the checklist. This responsiveness ensures that all users have access to the latest version of the checklist and can observe the collective progress.
By understanding and considering the interplay between stocks and flows in this collaborative checklist example, designers can create an efficient and engaging user experience. They can focus on designing intuitive interactions for adding, removing, and updating checklist items. Additionally, they can implement real-time synchronization mechanisms to enable users to view updates made by others, fostering a sense of collaboration and accountability within the shared checklist.
Overall, this UI example showcases how the concept of stocks and flows can be applied to a collaborative checklist, empowering designers to create systems that facilitate efficient task management and seamless collaboration among multiple users. By leveraging stocks to represent the checklist items and flows to capture user interactions and updates, designers can build intuitive interfaces that enhance productivity and teamwork.
Events within a design system represent the visible aspects—the specific occurrences or actions that users engage with. However, focusing solely on these events fails to capture the underlying factors influencing user behaviour. By applying systems thinking, designers can recognize events as indicators of deeper issues and motivations.
Patterns of behaviour offer valuable insights into user tendencies and recurring trends. For example, designers may identify a high dropout rate at a specific step in a process. Rather than addressing this issue in isolation, systems thinking prompts designers to investigate the systemic factors contributing to the pattern. They may discover usability issues, confusing information hierarchy, or misalignment with users' mental models. Understanding these patterns allows designers to develop design elements that address the underlying causes, resulting in a smoother user journey.
Mental models, another essential component of the Icebergs Model, heavily influence user behaviour and experiences. These mental models encompass users' assumptions, beliefs, and cognitive frameworks. By considering these underlying mental models, designers can create design elements that align with users' expectations and minimize interaction friction. For instance, a form validation design element can be developed to provide real-time feedback based on users' mental models, reducing errors and enhancing the overall experience.
By utilizing systems thinking and the Icebergs Model, designers can develop design systems deeply rooted in understanding the underlying causes of user behaviour. This approach promotes a comprehensive system understanding and allows for targeted interventions. Design elements are no longer isolated components but strategically designed to address systemic issues and create a seamless user experience.
For instance, when building a design system for a checkout process, designers can analyze patterns of behaviour to identify common pain points. By exploring users' mental models during this process, they can align the design elements with users' expectations. This may involve designing intuitive form fields, clear validation messages, and a straightforward flow that matches users' mental models. The result is a more streamlined and user-friendly checkout experience.
In summary, incorporating systems thinking and the Icebergs Model into developing a design system empowers designers to create elements that address the root causes of user behaviour. By going beyond surface-level events and considering patterns of behaviour and mental models, designers can develop cohesive design systems that provide intuitive and seamless user experiences. This approach enhances the overall effectiveness of design elements, resulting in higher user satisfaction and improved system performance.
Atomic design starts with breaking down the user interface into its smallest elements, called atoms. Atoms represent the basic building blocks of the interface, such as buttons, inputs, labels, and icons. These atoms are the foundation of the design system.
Atoms can be combined to form higher-level components called molecules. Molecules are groups of atoms that work together to fulfil a specific function. For example, a search form could be a molecule composed of an input atom and a button atom.
Organisms are more complex components that are built by combining molecules and/or atoms. They represent distinct sections or modules of an interface, such as a navigation bar or a product card. Templates, on the other hand, provide a structure for arranging organisms on a page or screen.
The atomic design encourages the consistent composition of components. Following predefined rules, the components can be combined and reused in various ways to create new interfaces. This promotes efficiency and maintainability in design and development workflows.
The atomic design emphasizes using design tokens, which are variables or constants that define the visual and functional attributes of components. Design tokens include values like colours, typography, spacing, and sizing. By using design tokens, changes to these values can be made globally, ensuring consistency across the entire system.
The atomic design promotes the creation of comprehensive documentation and a style guide for the design system. Documentation should include guidelines on how to use and customize each component, as well as examples and code snippets. A style guide provides a visual reference for designers and developers, ensuring a unified and cohesive look and feel.
The atomic design allows for the scalability and reusability of components. Designing components in a modular and hierarchical manner can be easily combined, modified, and extended to create new interfaces. This approach reduces redundancy and improves efficiency when building and maintaining complex systems.
Atomic design principles emphasize the importance of governance in maintaining and evolving a design system. Administration involves establishing clear ownership, defining processes for updating and maintaining the system, and ensuring collaboration between designers, developers, and other stakeholders.
At the heart of this theory lies Kwok, the bedrock of our design system. Kwok comprises the essential components that shape our interfaces, including design tokens such as color styling, font styling, and other stylistic elements. By harnessing Kwok, we unlock the power of highly reusable elements, serving as the smallest units within our system.
Derived from Kwok, atoms emerge as the fundamental elements in our design system. These indivisible components embody the essence of basic user interface elements, encompassing buttons, inputs, labels, icons, and more. Atoms are thoughtfully crafted to be self-contained entities, each possessing distinctive properties and behaviours.
In the Kwok framework, molecules transcend the limitations of individual atoms. By combining atoms, we construct molecules that synergistically fulfill specific functions or manifest as intricate UI elements. Molecules epitomize the art of interplay, as multiple atoms interact harmoniously to deliver cohesive experiences. Consider, for instance, the intermingling of an input atom and a button atom forming a search form molecule.
Matter represents a dynamic evolution in our design system, where atoms and molecules coalesce to create contained components. Beyond their visual and stylistic facets, Matter elements incorporate interaction design principles, propelling our interfaces into the realm of interactivity. Gestures, selection mechanisms, and intuitive inputs become intrinsic to Matter, ensuring seamless user experiences across various devices, be it a mouse, keyboard, or touchpad. Inspired by material design interactive theory, Matter elements enrich interactions and foster user-friendly environments.
Within our design theory, elements orchestrate the symphony of Matter components. These collections of Matter elements provide a structured arrangement, shaping the overall composition and layout of our pages or screens. By seamlessly organizing multiple Matter components, elements promote consistency and cohesiveness, thereby enhancing the overall user experience.
(incorporating Interaction Design):In this paradigm, Organism assumes the role of complete screens or views, analogous to pages in conventional design theories. Comprising a holistic amalgamation of Elements, Matter components, and Kwok elements, Organisms transcend mere visual and structural considerations. Integrating interaction design principles, Organisms embrace gestures, selection mechanisms, and input devices, resulting in meaningful and engaging user experiences.